Long-term Healing Results in ENART Therapy

I would like to share my own experience in studying the long-term healing results of using ENART devices (ENART 907 in particular) in order to assess the regenerative reactions that appear in the body in response to the influence of pulses generated by the device.

In my opinion, this study will help both the ENART beginners and those ENART users who have already have  some experience in ENART therapy.

To begin with, I would like to remind you of some distinctive features of ENART therapy and its basic differences from other therapies. 

ENART is a modern reflex therapy. It has no drawbacks and is easy, simple and convenient to use. 

ENART is applied to some specific skin points on the body and works with short-pulsed high-amplitude electric signals that dynamically change their form according to the body’s response to device stimulation. This establishes a biological feedback: device – body – device.

ENART is applied to some specific skin points on the body that works with short-pulsed high-amplitude electric signals and dynamically change their form according to the body’s response to device stimulation. 

Pulses generated by the device cause various reactions in the body, that help to restore the impaired or lost functions of the body. It is important to note that there is no habituation of the body to ENART treatment. The less habitual the impact impulse is for the body, the more effective and shorter in time the treatment will be.

The reactions of the body, formed as a result of ENART treatment will initiate regulatory recovering processes that are extended in time. In some cases it is enough to have 1 or 2 sessions to get full recovery, but this, as a rule, applies to acute conditions (existing over a short period of time). 

A long-existing (chronic) problem will require (in most cases) treatments of 10 to 12 sessions per course or even several such courses. After ENART treatment all the metabolic processes in the body would be restored. The organs will resume their normal bodily functions, this means that not the symptom, but the cause of the disease will disappear.

So, when we use ENART therapy, we not only remove pain syndrome (any ENART 900 series device will cope with this task ideally), but from the very start we are working for complete recovery as much as possible in each particular situation. And the main thing here is to remember that the body’s self-recovery and alteration will take time from several days to several months.  

When treating a long-existing pathology, improvement usually comes in the course of treatment, but maximum healing effect should be expected in a month after the treatment is completed and the health-improving activity in the body will continue for a longer period of time (up to 3 months).

Formerly I heard from my tutor and later I myself came across the situation when the patient that I treated told me: “You know, after you finished my treatment course, I still had some symptoms of my illness, but after a month I recovered from them all by myself.” If you know terms of healing and therapeutic features of ENART treatment, you should always explain to the patient in detail what he or she can expect from the treatment and at what point in time. This is because most people prefer pharmaceuticals that only relieve the symptoms of the disease. For instance, a patient takes a pill and after 15 minutes his or her blood pressure has returned to norm, pain is relieved, etc.

Such therapies suppress protective and adaptation reactions of the body and destroy its self-regulation mechanism, which subsequently leads to the transition of the illness into its chronic condition.

After the first uses of my ENART device I was not always fully satisfied with the healing results at the end of each course of treatment. I must say that I had mainly dealt with the advanced diseases when a patient had already undergone various therapies of which were not always harmless.

I observed the improvement, but some symptoms remained, which bothered me. I was determined to find the cause, analyzed the results and made some changes in the healing process. There were also patients whose problems could not be completely resolved during one course of treatment.

One day while training, I hurt my wrist and got the second wrist joint and ligamentous injury, which usually takes much time to heal. From my own experience, I know that the healing process may last from several months to a year or more and can be exacerbated at the most inconvenient moment. So, I took my ENART device and got down to treatment. Pain considerably reduced but appeared again on the wrist activity. I held 5 sessions of ENART therapy while continuing to exercise in my usual manner. After three weeks, I found that the pain syndrome disappeared and did not appear even on the wrist activity.

The next case that attracted my attention was with my wife (I think those who attempted to heal their relatives will understand me). For several years, she experienced pains in the thoracic and lumbosacral parts of the spine, but as it usually happens, “she has never had time for healing”. She took 8 sessions, with some sessions held not to the full extent (difficulties with treating relatives). To my questions about therapeutic effects she answered that nothing helped her. After about a month I noticed that she no longer had any complaints about her pain. The palpatory inspection had shown her spine was almost painless! To my question about her health she answered that the pain gradually disappeared and she simply forgot to tell me about it.

Then I began, wherever possible, to track the long-term healing results I got from my all “complicated” patients. It turned out that within a month after completion of the course of treatment, most patients either fully recovered or their health had considerably improved.

I used ENART therapy on one of my patients for Traumatic Epicondylitis on his right arm (tennis elbow). The condition occurred after injury he had about a year ago. Before visiting me, he saw various medical specialists and took mainly non-steroidal hormones and physiotherapy – with minimum results whatsoever. It should be noted that the patient could not limit physical activity of his injured arm due to the nature of his profession. Nonetheless, after 5 ENART sessions the patient experienced considerable improvement: the elbow joint range of motions had increased and the pain syndrome that disturbed him for a year had actually disappeared. There were some uncomfortable sensations on wrist squeeze and occasional pains on activity that still remained. When I met him after two months, he was happy to report that those residual effects had gradually disappeared and now his right arm is fully functional.  

There were many other positive long-term healing results.

For example, after ENART treatment a long-expected child was born unto someone, someone got rid of skin problems, etc. But the main thing for me is that I have understood the basic features of ENART therapy and can now confidently explain to the patients how their healing will progress.

In addition, I would like to note some factors that negatively affect the effectiveness of the treatment. First of all, these are smoking, alcohol consumption and frequent use of chemical drugs, especially antibiotics and non-steroidal hormones which interrupt recovery processes not allowing them to reach a logical and favorable completion.

Before ENART sessions I always warn my patients against the above mentioned factors because with them the healing process goes slower, its effectiveness will decrease by 40%, more sessions will be needed for the course of treatment. My warnings often make the patients get rid of their bad habits.

I have used various biofeedback devices in the past, but after I purchased ENART 907, healing effects came much faster with it.

Starting every session, I always feel confident in success and believe in the ability of the device to cope with any problem. Of course, ENART 907 is not a panacea, but so far I have had no single case where the device could not help patients. This device really allows you to feel full freedom of creativity in approaches to treatment and significantly expands the boundaries of therapeutic effects. 

I wish you all to have good health and be successful in all your deeds!